|
|||||||||
|
Home | Forums | Register | Gallery | FAQ | Calendar |
Retailers | Community | News/Info | International Retailers | IRC | Today's Posts |
|
Thread Tools |
October 19th, 2015, 11:35 | #1 |
FPS chrony measurement - automatic
If someone can humour me on why this occurs...
Using the usual cheapy XCORTECH X3200, single shot will measure the FPS just fine. When you switch to auto or burst, it will measure the ROF but the FPS is inaccurate. For example, single shot I'd get 260 FPS, but switch to auto and the FPS reading is 385. Now I understand the FPS is incorrect but why is it so? Just curious to understand where the failing is from a technical/physics(?) standpoint. |
|
October 19th, 2015, 11:51 | #2 |
Your chronograph/gun is broken.
__________________
The Steve has spoken. |
|
October 19th, 2015, 12:34 | #3 |
That would be the simplest answer but I'd push on to be broken how? The chrony itself is accurate when measured against another. The gun does in fact shoot ~260 single shot... I'm just wondering if such a low end chrony cannot accurate measure FPS when measuring ROF (huh?!)
I should check the manual |
|
October 19th, 2015, 12:37 | #4 |
Squid Porn Superstar, I love the tentacles!
|
Your gun is not working properly.
Is your hop off? Your BBs may not be locking into the chamber. |
October 19th, 2015, 12:43 | #5 | |
Quote:
The gun is the P90 I have other threads on and is using the stock CYMA spring with just over 1.5 coils cut. Given the stock FPS was ~400, I tend to think that the ~260 FPS on semi is accurate. But if that's the case, how in the heck would it do 385 (readout)? Unless of course the semi shooting is hosed and firing much lower than it should consistently shot to shot. To rule out the chrony itself I'd have to test with my other AEGs on full auto. I should do that -- will report back. |
||
October 19th, 2015, 12:50 | #6 |
Not Eye Safe, Pretty Boy Maximus on the field take his picture!
|
I've never seen any errors on XCORTECH chrono's when shooting full auto, I would say it's most likely your gun.
|
October 19th, 2015, 12:57 | #7 |
Thanks doc, the answer will be more clear when I run the other three AEGs through it as well. Having said that, I'm wondering out it could run at 260 on a cut down spring in semi and 385 on full auto :banghead:
|
|
October 19th, 2015, 13:22 | #8 |
Squid Porn Superstar, I love the tentacles!
|
The fact that you cut the spring has nothing to do with your FPS inconsistency.
|
October 19th, 2015, 13:44 | #9 |
My cut spring comment is more for the very improbable 385 FPS. An original spring doing 400 with over 1.5 coils cut (forward end) only dropped 15 FPS? That's from my armchair reading about cutting as little as possible and not to go beyond 2 coils mind you. Your thoughts?
|
|
October 19th, 2015, 14:16 | #10 |
Squid Porn Superstar, I love the tentacles!
|
Every spring is different, but a coil and a half dropping 15 FPS sounds normal.
|
October 19th, 2015, 14:19 | #11 |
Ok thank you for your check. I have absolutely NO idea how many FPS even a ballpark drop might be. Given people say don't do more than 2 coils (risk of PME?) I thought the drop might be drastic. I'm going to start another thread since I've done a sanity check and the chrony is fine with the other AEGs semi/auto.
|
|
October 19th, 2015, 14:22 | #12 | |
Squid Porn Superstar, I love the tentacles!
|
Quote:
It doesn't matter how many coils you cut off as long as the spring is still longer than the distance between the spring guide and front of the piston. As long as it is at least that long you won't get PME caused by the spring. |
|
October 19th, 2015, 14:51 | #13 | |
Quote:
|
||
October 19th, 2015, 15:42 | #14 |
Traveling Man
|
Wait people are still cutting springs instead of spending $10 on a replacement one that is rated for a fps range?
|
October 19th, 2015, 16:31 | #15 |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|