Thread: KWA vs. CA
View Single Post
Old May 13th, 2009, 13:59   #44
Amos
 
Amos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tokushima, Japan
Send a message via MSN to Amos
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Saint View Post
What are we talking about specifically? Dimensions or design? IIRC, both KWA and CA use tabs (like TM) to hold the upper down.

I personally don't trust those tabs, even in metal (airsoft) guns, so I'd never get a CA or KWA.
CA doesn't use tabs... don't know where you got that idea from.

CA uses the same upper receiver system that G&P does.

In my experiences CA are much higher quality than KWA... KWA's just doing the same thing that chinese clone companies are.. They're releasing stock guns that are "pre-upgraded" with lower-end parts to make them more attractive to new players.

CA's Aluminum bodies are very good, same with their internals (the new versions of the guns have very solid internals)
__________________
Custom Builds:
FA3674U
Krinkov
G3SD6
Amos is offline   Reply With Quote