hey wait, i just thought about something.
The term replica (which is the tricky strange term used to define airsoft as 'illegal) is something like this....
A “replica firearm” is a device that was designed and intended to look exactly like or almost exactly like a real firearm (except for an antique firearm) but isn’t a real firearm. Most Replicas cannot discharge projectiles at all, or discharge only harmless projectiles. Devices that discharge projectiles that cause serious bodily injury are not Replicas...
Does this not mean it is completely legal to import broomhandle mausers!? they were built in 1895!!
the 1911 will be in apprx 2 years
many different revolvers
EDIT: btw, that definition was taken from the mr. wong vs regina court case.