Originally Posted by TokyoSeven
No that wont win the arguement, if you think using abunch of old cases as ammunition to win an argument is going to work your mistaken, your arguement is still full of transparent "ifs" and your single interpretation of writings.
But seriosly though, this time Im done with this, the horse is dead and beat. Im outa this argument for good.
Did you actually read the cases?
They are from 2007 and 2008!