View Single Post
Old January 6th, 2008, 18:00   #101
mcguyver's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Northern Alberta
Originally Posted by Oberst39 View Post
So, what you are saying is that the authorities must prove that the object was acquired after 1998 however they will not persue individual owners to do this but rather go after the retailers?
No. I think in that case, they were covering their butts to ensure a conviction. The act seems to be structured to place the onus for proof on the accused.
Age verifier Northern Alberta

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep discussing what's for dinner.

Freedom is the wolves limping away while the sheep reloads.

Never confuse freedom with democracy.
mcguyver is offline