And in Oregon they don't particularly give a shit. You'll notice the article didn't have any of the anti-gun slant you'd have seen here or in an anti-gun state like New York, and the kid wasn't charged with any weapons offences, apart from the suspicion of second-degree assault (requires a dangerous or deadly weapon).
The fact that it's "suspicion of" may mean there's doubt as to whether he actually did what is claimed. At least in my interpretation. LD?
Originally Posted by Deaf_shooter
what if it model after his?