Originally Posted by Brian McIlmoyle
If there was informal agreement to try to avoid scheduling conflicts then every host could get a maximization of attendance.
Which provides benefits to everyone.
I can't say I've gone to the games hosted on ASC, but here's the way I see it.
A game doesn't need a large amount of players to be fun. A 30 vs 30 player game is played very differently than a 15 on 15 or 10 on 10. IMO, different people look for different type of games, some prefer 1 huge milsim, while others like having muliple fields like at Wasaga or FR. I personally like smaller games just because it feels more intense, and spend less time on the sideline after being shot. (At least that's how I feel when I go play paintball with a group of friends)
As long as turn-out rate is good enough to host a game (which the general feedbacks agree), I don't see a problem of one field having a big game and another having a small game.