Originally Posted by DuffMan
So, this isn't a justification of Glock's ludicrous bribery-based sales model or even their schizophrenic Horse Performance centre which knowingly sold a magnificent dressage horse into what was essentially torture at the hands of the Rath family, but do we actually believe that Glock had no legitimate claim to damages from the airsoft industry? I mean, granted the best thing to do would've been to adopt the 'can't-beat-em-join-em' attitude exhibited by HK, S&W, Magpul, etc, but surely they have a right to their trademarks?
The airsoft animus is merely a symptom of the megalomania. Once his majesty has issued a decree any and all traitors must be punished. No mater if they're your own family or partners. He'll scheme away for years; or lash out in an instant but it's not going to be in any way rational.
Interesting in that someone who could create such a commonsense simple pistol couldn't apply the KISS principle to other aspects of life.