Originally Posted by Drake
Just to reiterate for the general public what I said on the other thread, the point being addressed isn't so much if people agree/disagree with it but whether or not it's ASC's (admin/staff) place to police this.
If the community (or groups) want to take a stance against certain people and ostracize them, retailers not sell to them, etc that's one thing. But should ASC's administration be policing people's activities outside of the forums?
Indeed , that is the question.. and the answer has to be
NO .. it's not within ASC's mandate to do so
AND as a field owner I object to some body external to me choosing who I do or do not allow on my field, If I don't have a voice in those decisions.
As a clearing house for information .. certainly ASc could be a Host for conversations between hosts/ owners regarding such restrictions but only as a venue to have those conversations and not as a party to them